Hi Sander,
Sorry for delay.
Thank you for your support on this issue.
I'll create a SAP support message and write you back as soon as I receive any feedback.
BR from Brazil.
César Sevilha.
↧
Re: New field are not relevante for delta (2LIS_11_VAKON)
↧
Re: Difference between 0MATERIAL_ATTR and 0ARTICLE_ATTR
After all this time, the answer is :
- both datasources will extract the same data in Full mode
- 0ARTICLE_ATTR will extract data created/modified via MM41/MM42 in delta mode
- 0MATERIAL_ATTR will extract data created/modified via MM01/MM02 in delta mode
↧
↧
0co_om_opa_6 selection company code in extracion
Dear Experts,
I am using 0co_om_opa_6, since this datasource has huge data I am getting dumps also loading is running for a long time.
to load data with selection as Company code. 0co_om_opa_6 has no selection company code.
I tried to change datasource selection in Tx. RSA6. But this datasource is not allowed to use CCODE selection. For data loading for data processing in IPak I used PSA to avoid more time.
Here I have 3.x data flow
.
Please advise.
Thanks
↧
Re: 0co_om_opa_6 selection company code in extracion
Hi,
Required field might be hidden by SAP.
thru small abap code we can enable required field for selection.
Lets check table - ROOSFIELD and see your data source and fields.
field CCODE - Coulmn SELECTION - A(hidden by SAP). If yes then we can change that selection property A to P/X.
use below sample code and do the syntax check.
You need to write below logic at source side SE38.
do it dev system and later do test load. After that you can move your program to further servers.
Sample Code.
REPORT ZSELECTION.
Tables: ROOSFIELD.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM ROOSFIELD WHERE OLTPSOURCE = '0CO_OM_OPA_6' AND
OBJVERS = 'A' AND FIELD ='CCODE'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
ROOSFIELD-SELECTION ='X'.
MODIFY ROOSFIELD.
ENDIF.
Execute above program once and later check data source at RSA6. it mgith be enabled for selection.
Thanks
↧
Re: 0co_om_opa_6 selection company code in extracion
Hi Raman,
Hope you are good.
I have check in ROOSFIELD in se16, ccode (Bukrs) is plain in selection column.
Thanks
↧
↧
Logic of delta loading 0FI_*_4
Hi experts,
I just want to understand, how the Delta loading of 0FI_*_4 extractors are working.
First of all, I'd like to give U the Setting and Delta Information.
1. the most important fields of BWOM_SETTINGS table looks like this
2. The last Change of example documents
3. The last time stamp of Delta extraction
Actually I expected that the document in loaded in DSO, but it is not.
Could anyone explain it to me? Thank you!
regards,
Van Anh
↧
Re: 0co_om_opa_6 selection company code in extracion
Plain mean blank. so it won't possible to do selection but visibility set. mean BUKRS field is visible at RSA6 but not possible to do selection.
So use above code and try it.
↧
Impact of two LIS jobs running at the same time in source system
Hi All,
I would like to understand the impact of two LIS jobs running at the same time in source system.
For example previous instance of job LIS-BW-VB_APPLICATION_02_100 is still running while the next scheduled run starts.
Would such a scenario lead to loss of data ?
Thanks,
AG
↧
Re: Impact of two LIS jobs running at the same time in source system
Hi,
No loss of data. But may leads to duplication or data may delayed.
Even why you guys are running program like that way. is there any special case?
Even OLTP system performance mag impact.
Its delta jobs, need to check the job taking time(data volume) and schedule them accordingly.
Thanks
↧
↧
Re: The level of the node ID 00062627 does not suit the lev. of the higher lev.
HI Sharif,
I faced a similar error - "The level of the node ID 00062627 does not suit the lev. of the higher lev."
Your solution to Refresh the cache using the program UJA_REFRESH_DIM_CACHE worked.
Appreciate your help.
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Apoorv Kashyap
↧
Re: The level of the node ID 00062627 does not suit the lev. of the higher lev.
Hi Apoorve,
I'm glad it worked for you.
Beast Regards,
Sharif
↧
Extractor to pull CC, GL , Vendor , Invoice etc..
Hi Experts
We are on BI 7.0 SP6
We have an requirement to report on combination of fields -> CC , GL , Invoice, Vendor , Document no and others.
Is there any standard extractor available for this or any guidance will be helpful.
Thanks..
↧
Re: Extractor to pull CC, GL , Vendor , Invoice etc..
Hi,
Is that your functional spec or technical spec?
Thru filed based we can't decide what data source/flow needed.
please sit with your business users or functional team, Get proper requirement.
Thru requirement itself you may think related data sources.
later check required fields are part data source ot nor.
Later think about look ups or enhancement as per the availability bw existing data if required fields are not part of standard data source.
As my guess you may FI/SD billing data source.
please look for them on google.
Thanks
↧
↧
Extract SAP DATA (FICO/ Accounting data) to SQL server for BPC MS
Hi Guys,
What are the options to extract data from SAP ECC using Microsoft SSIS to use it in BPC MS version.
I saw some post but they're all very old. I found also solutions with connectors but very expensive.
Xtract IS - Price & Order - Theobald Software GmbH
SAP system is 720
SQL server is 2012
If anyone can help me with that, would be great !
↧
Re: Icons / Symbols within SBIW DataSource tree
Hello,
This is a new feature implemented in 740. The green/red flag shows if the data source is released for ODP or not. You could find more information about it in top menu “Utilities” > “Color Key”.
More about ODP: http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/709e0dae-e90d-2f10-6e90-8106dad4a34e?QuickLink=index&…
Note: 1558737 - Data Sources released for ODP data replication API
Br, András
↧
Re: Enhance 0FI_TV_01 to add fields from table PTRV_SREC
Thanks Ram and Amit.
↧
Re: Logic of delta loading 0FI_*_4
Hi Van,
A couple of things to check -
1. Can you check if the record is present in PSA? - did it go overwrittern based on Keys of DSO?
2. In infopackage delta, do you have any restrictions related to company code?
Looking at the time lines in the screenshots the record should be extracted in BW system.
Thanks
Amit
↧
↧
Re: Logic of delta loading 0FI_*_4
Hi,
Please review SAP Note 1012874 - FAQ extractors 0FI_AP_* 0FI_AR_* 0FI_GL_*(except 10), it contains a lot of information which you could be looking for.
Best regards,
Sander
↧
Re: The Text Field Changed in Delta mechanism for 0FI_GL_14
Hi Wei,
It could be a bug. Please let me know your SAP ECC release and SP level.
E.g. I found SAP Note 1938533 - 0FI_GL_14: Delta mode: Changed and cleared documents are missing which could be applicable depending on the answer to my question.
Best regards,
Sander
↧
Re: The Text Field Changed in Delta mechanism for 0FI_GL_14
Hi Sander,
Thank you very much. Based on the SAP note you attached, requires SPS12, but we are on 6. So BASIS team has patched that. I am doing another round of the test.
However, I think the scenario is a bit different from the note. Please see the details below:
During the Delta Extraction Test for 0FI_GL_14, the newly created documents, deleted documents(actually reversed document) could be captured by BODS Job via BW extractor 0FI_GL_14.
However, the text field changes in the existing GL documents cannot be captured via BW extractor 0FI_GL_14.
In SAP they have set it up that only text can be changed on documents – no significant data, e.g. values/GL Accounts or Cost centres can be changed after saving.
These text fields are including:
General Ledger Document:
Assignment BSEG-ZUONR
Text BSEG-SGTXT
Accounts Payable Document
Payment term BSEG-ZTERM
Bline Date BSEG-ZFBDT
Payment Block BSEG-ZLSPR
Assignment BSEG-ZUONR
Text BSEG-SGTXT
Accounts Receivable Document
Payment term BSEG-ZTERM
Bline Date BSEG-ZFBDT
Payment Block BSEG-ZLSPR
Assignment BSEG-ZUONR
Text BSEG-SGTXT
BW Extractor 0FI_GL_O14 is using the ABAP Function FAGL_GET_SI_DATA(Line Item Extractors for General Ledger) to
extract data(initialization and delta) from the tables FAGLFLEXA, BKPF, BSEG, and BSEG_ADD. And the delta capture is based on the timestamp in Table BWFI_AEDAT.
Based on the test of text fields changes test, when the text fields changes, the table BWFI_AEDAT Table indeed captures the changes.
Take the test doc as example:
Document 1200004006
However, it seems the timestamp in BWFI_AEDAT for this document does not make it as a part delta. Because I ran BODS job immediately after this change, I cannot get this document as a part of delta in the result.
The time stamp in Table BWFI_AEDAT for changes seems to be on the document level, so I am guessing there should be something else in SAP side to determine which fields are in the delta or not?
Regards,
Wei
↧