Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - Business Content and Extractors
Viewing all 5631 articles
Browse latest View live

STOs(Stock Transfer Order) in BW Sales Order Activity Report

$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

We are having the requirement to bring STOs in BW Sales Order Activity Report.

 

Now in case of STOs, only PO number is there in ECC there is no sales order or its Item number.

 

Currently we are using 2LIS_11_V_SSL data source,

 

Requirement is as following for the STOs,

 

DateOrderShipmentOpen Orders
1st Feb 2015500 MT0 MT500 MT
2nd Feb 2015500 MT200 MT300 MT
5th Feb 2015500 MT500 MT0 MT

 

Please share your insights on this.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Bhavin Vyas


Re: Icons / Symbols within SBIW DataSource tree

$
0
0

so in 7.3x it refers to DataSources used for "embedded" analytics (as I suspected)?

Delta Extractor for AA_AA_11 & 0FI_AA_12 not working

$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

i have a concern regarding Asset extraction.

We are extracting data in a delta mode for Extractor 0FI_AA_12 after a depreciation has run in a new month

1. Load 0ASSET_ATTR_TEXT

2. Load 0ASSET_AFAB_ATTR

3. Load 0FI_AA_11

4. Load 0FI_AA_12

Unfortunately the extractor is delivering the already delivered data records for January, including all simulated depreciation
periods until December.

This data volume is about 50 million data records for each time.

 

Settings are “0” for the parameter BWFIAASIM in table BWOM_SETTINGS.

What settings should be set to get delta?

 

If a new settings will be set, how can i test the extraction with just a couple of data to make sure that the delta is working before loading millions of data.

 

 

Thanks for helping

 

 

Pat

Extractor Enhancement - No history to be updated

$
0
0

Hello Team,

 

         We have a plan to enhance a extractor for which a new field will be added to the extract structure. The user is really not looking for the old records (History) needs to be updated with the new fields values; but they are more concerned with the values to be populated in the filed for the future data.

 

In that case do we need to delete and fill the setup tables ? I guess no.

What action required to be done from the data loading perspective.

 

Thanks

San

Re: Extractor Enhancement - No history to be updated

$
0
0

Hi San,

 

As you said setup table so I am guessing your datasource is related to LIS.

SO if you don't need the historical data then you are right you will not require to fill up setup tables.

Ideally, you have make sure that before you move the changes in to Prod system your delta queues (RSA7) and extraction queues (LBWQ) must be empty and not extraction is taking place from BI system.

After you move the changes you will have to replicate your datasource and then move the BI system transports to make the datasources in sync with your source system.

Then try running a dry delta from BI system or if required initialize the datasource again. You should be good then.

 

Thanks

Amit

Re: Delta Extractor for AA_AA_11 & 0FI_AA_12 not working

$
0
0

Hi Patrick,

 

BAdI implementation FIAA_BW_DELTA_UPDATE is delivered inactive. You have to activate it using t/code SE19 (choose for Classic BAdI).

Please refer also to SAP Help.

 

Best regards,

Sander

Re: Extractor Enhancement - No history to be updated

$
0
0

Hi San,

 

If you do not need a retrospective population of the new fields, then indeed it does not make sense to fill the setup tables with the corresponding downtime. However, be careful if you add new fields (or make changes in general) to the communication structure.

 

Please refer to the following SAP Notes for more information:

 

 

Best regards,

Sander

Profit Center and Cost Center valid to date

$
0
0

Hi SCN,

 

I am having a problem when it comes to bex query on how I will manage to set my query to read the profit center's / cost center's text for valid to date = "31.12.9999". Also, it appears that I am having an extra line where in a valid to date "31.12.1899" is created, upon DTP loading. Though I am having the correct data extraction from PSA. Can someone please explain this to me? Or am I missing a setting for my master data objects?

 

profit cetner.PNG

I am avoiding this duplication of record since we need to push this data to BPC with its text.

 

Thanks.


Re: Extractor Enhancement - No history to be updated

$
0
0

Hi,

 

If  users don't need historic data then filling setup tables is not required.


As per the CMOD logic enhanced field will be filled in daily delta loads.

 

But once you done enhancement, you need to be very careful while moving transports to prod system.

 

Source system need to be locked and clear all delta queues(SMQ1/RSA7/SM13/LBWQ).

Clearing delta queue means we need to load all delta records to bw.

 

Thanks

Re: Profit Center and Cost Center valid to date

$
0
0

Hi,

 

Can you try to see the source data how its have records at RSA3.

 

Check at source side RSA3.

Enter your profit center/cost center and see how many records exist.

Whether source also have a record with valid to date - 31.12.1899 or not.

 

if that extract record not required and not been used any any transactions data then you can delete that record at bw side.

 

Thanks

0CO_OM_NWA_2 Extractor

$
0
0

On the pull from ECC using this extractor for 28 days out of 30 it runs in acceptable time.  However 1-2 days a month (always in the first 6 days) it will go from 5 minutes to 5 hours with very comparable records pulled.  Seems that record count does not matter.  Example

2/3/2015 pulled 4113 records in 5hr 40m

2/4/2015 pulled 12,639 records in 1h 54m (more records less time than day before)

2/5/2015 pulled 1268 records in 3m  ( so slightly more than double record on 2/3, but 5h 37m longer to extract)

 

I've checked everything else running in ECC on the days it takes so long compared to the other days and nothing additional is running on the long extraction days.

Here is what I see in the ECC log:

02/03/2015 00:42:55 *************************************************************************
02/03/2015 00:42:55 1 LUWs confirmed and 1 LUWs to be deleted with function module RSC2_QOUT_CONFIRM_DATA
02/03/2015 06:23:47 Call customer enhancement BW_BTE_CALL_BW204010_E (BTE) with 4,113 records
02/03/2015 06:23:47 Result of customer enhancement: 4,113 records
02/03/2015 06:23:47 Call customer enhancement EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (CMOD) with 4,113 records

 

You see the long lag time betweeen 00:42:55 and 06:23:47.  On the days this extracts fast, there are just seconds of a lag time.

We have made the changes BWOM_SETTINGS based on SAP Note 631836.

 

Also, you see in the log it reads "EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (CMOD) with 4,113 records".    In CMOD on the ECC side there is no code for extractor 0CO_OM_NWA_2 so I am not sure why it would say that.  Looking back at my BIREQU* jobs in SM37, looks like I can't find any extractor that does not show it calls that Customer exit.  Maybe I just haven't noticed that in the past?

 

Thanks for any help.

Re: 0CO_OM_NWA_2 Extractor

$
0
0

Hi Keith,

 

I would think that there must be other jobs that are holding processing over the month start. Probably the finance jobs that update tables. So your datasource processing is kept on hold for few hours.

So please check other monthly schedueld jobs that run at the same time of extraction of 0CO_OM* datasource.

Also while the job is running can see how many free back groun processes are availalbe in the system?

take help from basis team to assess system processes running at time of execution of datasource.

 

Thanks

Amit

Re: 0CO_OM_NWA_2 Extractor

$
0
0

Amit,

 

Thanks for this info.  I've checked all the processes for every day in ECC and nothing is running.  However, I've not been able to see available processes.

 

Are you saying that if another 0CO_OM job is running this could be a problem?  Because we do have some that kick off around the same time, but they only take minutes to run.  Could those be putting NWA_2 on hold even if another 0CO_OM starts and completes during that time?

Re: 0CO_OM_NWA_2 Extractor

$
0
0

Hi Keith,

 

I just had a look at the FM that extracts data for this datasource. It actually checks the locking on table   BWOM2_TIMEST based on the settings in table BWOM_SETTINGS for parameter LOCKING.

Can you send the settings of table BWOM_SETTINGS as I am not able to look at the SAP note

631836 (SAP says its not released)?

The mechanism of FICO datasources depend a lot on settings of these parameters.

So I think the table BWOM2_TIMEST stays locked and your datasources keep on waiting until it is unlocked.

 

Thanks

Amit

Re: 0CO_OM_NWA_2 Extractor

$
0
0

These are the setting from ECP for BWOM_SETTINGS:

 

0CO_OM_CCA_1     EXT_ZERO

0CO_OM_CCA_1     IBVACTIV

0CO_OM_CCA_9     OBJSELSIZE    X

0CO_OM_NTW_2     OBJSELSIZE    X

0CO_OM_NWA_2     OBJSELSIZE   X

0CO_OM_OPA_6     OBJSELSIZE    X

0CO_OM_WBS_6     OBJSELSIZE   X

0FI_GL_14              BWFIBSEGMO  2

0PM_OM_OPA_2     OBJSELSIZE    X

OFI_AA_12             BWFIAASIM 1

 

These are from BWOM2_TIMEST:

Datasource           Date          Time      FMode   Time GMT            Time GMT            Last TS

0CO_OM_CCA_9 02/06/2015 00:30:52 D          7,919,586,340,001 7,920,450,380,000 X

0CO_OM_NWA_2 02/06/2015 00:39:05 D         7,919,586,670,001 7,920,451,170,000 X

0CO_OM_OPA_6 02/06/2015 00:31:51 D         7,919,586,630,001 7,920,450,810,000 X

0CO_OM_WBS_6 02/06/2015 00:30:52 D        7,919,586,350,001 7,920,450,420,000 X

0PM_OM_OPA_2 02/06/2015 00:33:09 D        7,919,587,320,001 7,920,451,860,000 X

 

Thanks for your help.


Re: 0CO_OM_NWA_2 Extractor

$
0
0

Same info from 2/32015 where it had the long pause

BWOM2_TEST

0CO_OM_CCA_9   02/03/2015 01:02:25    D   7,916,994,340,001   7,917,858,430,000

0CO_OM_NWA_2  02/03/2015 06:23:46    D   7,916,994,880,001   7,917,866,580,000

0CO_OM_OPA_6   02/03/2015 01:02:36    D   7,916,994,740,001   7,917,860,850,000

0CO_OM_WBS_6  02/03/2015 00:42:06    D   7,916,994,380,001   7,917,858,440,000

0PM_OM_OPA_2  02/03/2015 01:41:47    D   7,916,995,180,001   7,917,899,590,000

Nothing above in Last TS

Re: SQL error -302 while accessing table /BIC/B0000370

Re: The Text Field Changed in Delta mechanism for 0FI_GL_14

$
0
0

Hi Wei,

 

Please review SAP Note 1012874 - FAQ extractors 0FI_AP_* 0FI_AR_* 0FI_GL_*(except 10). This SAP Note contains very detailed technical information behind the various DataSources. Note that although your DataSource 0FI_GL_14 is extracting from New General ledger, most of the information should still be applicable in my opinion.

Question 3 might give an answer to you question too. Furthermore, have a look to the Safety Time (table BWOM_SETTINGS) which might explain why you cannot extract the changed documents immediately.

 

Please also review SAP Note 1476708 - 0FI_GL_14: Too many records extracted because of BWFI_AEDAT. How is the parameter 'BWFIAUGBL' set for DataSource 0FI_GL_14 in table BWOM_SETTINGS? Are the FI document changes made in MM or SD?

 

Best regards,

Sander

Re: 0co_om_opa_6 selection company code in extracion

$
0
0

Yes..

 

I am trying through costelment for particular comcode... will it be efficient?

Re: 0co_om_opa_6 selection company code in extracion

$
0
0

Hi,

 

As an alternative, you could restrict on Fiscal Year/period (field FISCPER), Order (field AUFNR), Currency Type (field CURTYPE), or Order Category (field AUTYP).

 

Best regards,
Sander

Viewing all 5631 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>